Whitepapers & Technical Reports
In-depth technical documentation for decision makers and technical evaluators.
4 Reports
Available now
Free access
Work email required
Peer-reviewed
Geoscience content
Updated Q1 2026
Latest platform data
12 pages · PDF
Security Architecture for Institutional Seismic Data
A comprehensive technical reference covering SOC 2 Type II controls, end-to-end encryption, multi-tenant isolation, tamper-evident audit trails, and RBAC governance for enterprise seismic data platforms.
- SOC 2 Type II CC6, CC7, CC8 control mapping
- AES-256-GCM encryption at rest and TLS 1.3 in transit
- Ed25519 digital signatures for immutable audit chains
- Dual-control approval workflows per NIST SP 800-53 AC-3(2)
- Multi-tenant isolation — per-tenant Cosmos DB partitioning
- RBAC with 25 permissions across 8 resource domains
Audience: CISOs, security architects, compliance officers
18 pages · PDF
CCS Monitoring: From Science to Compliance Automation
How seismic AI automates CO₂ monitoring workflows from raw 4D time-lapse acquisition through Gassmann fluid substitution, mass balance conformance, and regulatory matrix reporting under EPA Class VI, EU CCS Directive, and IPCC guidelines.
- Gassmann fluid substitution for CO₂ saturation mapping
- IEA GHG 2009 mass balance with P10/P50/P90 uncertainty
- EPA Class VI, EU CCS Directive, IPCC 2006 compliance matrix
- Sleipner, Snøhvit, and Quest benchmark validation results
- ISO 31000 risk register with Bow-Tie and FEP frameworks
- Automated regulatory reporting — PDF and JSON export
Audience: Reservoir engineers, regulatory affairs, ESG leads
10 pages · PDF
OSDU R3 Integration: Zero Lock-In Data Strategy
A technical guide to publishing seismic interpretation results into OSDU R3-compliant data ecosystems. Covers record schema validation, deterministic record IDs, kind version lifecycle, and two-way migration between proprietary formats.
- OSDU R3 storage API — PUT /api/storage/v2/records integration
- Deterministic UUID v5 record IDs for idempotent publishing
- Kind version lifecycle: CURRENT → SUPPORTED → DEPRECATED
- BFS-based migration path computation (Cormen 2009 CLRS)
- JSON Schema Draft 7 remote schema validation with TTL cache
- SEG-Y Rev 2, LAS 3.0, GeoTIFF, and PDF export adapters
Audience: Data engineers, solutions architects, IT directors
8 pages · PDF
The ROI of AI-Powered Seismic Interpretation
A business case analysis comparing total cost of ownership between manual interpretation workflows and AI-assisted pipelines. Includes payback period modelling, interpreter time savings, and anonymised case studies from three basin operators.
- TCO model: licence + infrastructure + interpreter hours
- Typical payback period: 7–11 months at 3 surveys/month
- 60–80% cycle time reduction on horizon picking benchmarks
- CCS permitting acceleration — 4 weeks vs 14 weeks manual
- Case study: North Sea operator, 2.4× throughput increase
- CFO-ready sensitivity table — volume and staffing scenarios
Audience: C-suite, VP Operations, procurement committees
Want a custom briefing?
Our solutions engineering team can prepare a bespoke technical brief tailored to your basin, regulatory environment, and data architecture. Typically 45 minutes with your technical and commercial stakeholders.
Typically scheduled within 3–5 business days. No commitment required.